Parashat Devarim

 

Rav Haim Lifshitz

 

 

 

Home

Essays

Glossary

 

 

 

Essays and Articles:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Go to Hebrew site

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

A Human Religion

 

 

 Translated from Hebrew by S. NAthan

l'ilui nishmat Esther bat mordechai

 

 

Religion is perceived on the one hand as a system of laws whose purpose is the enforcement of arbitrary rules of behavior.  These rules have no relation to the utilitarian agenda of resolving the problems of one's existence.  Religion is perceived as the deliberate ignoring of existence’s needs, in favor of another world’s needs. 

 

Religion is a deliberate deviation – away from the narrow system of the existential survival instincts, and toward an axis of confrontation with survival which diverges from the narrow cycle of here and now.  Religion serves the human need to break out of the stranglehold of space and time toward the wide open spaces of infinity.  The rules of the game of religion are characterized by a movement from the tangible to the abstract.  From the clear and exact to the vague and undefined – to the mystical.  From logic and common sense to the absurd – to that which cannot be judged by utilitarian criteria, or by any other criteria belonging to a fixed monitoring system.

 

On the other hand, religion serves to bypass the compelling distresses of reality, guiding one toward an escape from the need to confront it, turning one away from a reality in which effort invested and successful results stand in direct correlation to one another, to look toward a reality in which effort invested stands in direct correlation to nothing at all in this world.

 

Along comes the Torah with the latest intelligence. “These are things man eats the dividends from, in this world, while the capital is kept for him for the next world.”  He eats here, and there as well.  His needs are not arbitrarily pushed aside.  He is not required to sacrifice his existence for the sake of an abstract value.  He is not required to uproot himself from his real and tangible situation for the sake of a vague and misty subjective experience that reduces the fullness of objective existential experience.

 

There is no spirituality without expression of values.  There are no values that are not attached to human morality.  There is no generality without particulars.  There is no “ahm Yisrael” without Reb Yisrael – without the individual Jew.  There is no society without private individuals, just as there is no private individual who does not belong to a group.  “Do not separate yourself from the public,” insists the Torah.  There is a symbiotic connection between the group and the private human being.

 

 This is the meaningful content of Sefer Devarim, which is called Mishneh Torah, meaning the entire Torah on one foot.  “Love your friend as yourself – this is a great rule of the Torah.”  “What is hateful to you, to your friend do not do.”  Sefer Devarim brings the Torah down, as it were, from the lofty heights of the mountain to the human dimension.  Sefer Devarim bends the laws of creation and fits them to human behavioral quality.  “And the days that we walked from Kadesh Barnea until the time we crossed  Zared River were thirty eight years, until the termination of that whole generation of warriors, from the midst of the camp.”  Hazal comment on this pasuk: “When they left Egypt, they crossed a great sea in one night by the sheer force of their faith.  And the faith-lacking generation of the desert were halted by a river whose dimensions were one zeret’s length by one zeret’s width, and they could not cross it for thirty eight years – until the termination of that entire  faith-lacking generation.”

 

We see here that objective reality does not determine success.  Control of reality is transferred from natural law to human qualitative power, and it is this latter which determines the extent of existential success.

 

Thus the right to the promised land is not dependent upon the physical might of the seven nations who dwell upon it, but rather upon their declining qualitative level, and upon the soaring qualitative level of ahm Yisrael.

 

A new state of affairs has come about in the creation that expresses its Creator.  The individual Jewish person is now the water line that runs between the universe and its Creator.  From now on, the Creator broadcasts messages to the universe by way of  the individual person.

 

It is important to note that man’s function as a broadcasting station is not a passive role.  This obligation and this duty are a function of man’s ability to determine the rules of the game in the agreement between the Creator and His universe, that agreement which took on flesh to become a covenant, between man – who became the bearer of the burden of responsibility for the world upon his weak shoulder – and his Creator.

 

How is it possible to place a burden so heavy upon the shoulder of a creature so limited?  The key to this mystery is to be found in the other side of the equation: Man bears upon his second shoulder a burden much heavier than the burden of the universe.  Simultaneously with the burden of the universe, man is given the title of nezer habria, “crown of creation”.   This is not merely a title appended onto a prior entity.  It transforms man into new and different stuff:  He turns into Godly Presence, as nezer habria, as in “all the nations of the land [and also all the other creants] will see that the Name of God is called upon you, and they will fear you.”  As Godly Presence, he is capable of bearing the responsibility for the universe, for the simple reason that creation has been ordered to obey him.

 

Man thus wears three crowns: The crown of one formed in God’s image, the crown of one controlling one’s own existence, and the crown of one controlling the creation.  Man wears these three crowns within the three concentric circles that surround him: The first circle is the personal circle  that encompasses “I”, one’s own uniquely original quality.  Within this circle, sustenance is drawn in a direct flow – from the image of God within one’s soul to one’s Godly source.

 

The second circle encompasses one’s personal expression, which is directed toward one’s immediate environment.  This is an expression of one’s Godly Presence, through creativity, through actualizing one’s unique qualitative potential, thus carving its personal stamp upon one’s environment – an environment that provides the raw materials for expressing one’s moral, value-based uniqueness.

 

The third circle encompasses the reality that is not directly included within one’s existence’s needs or within one’s direct sphere of influence.  This circle contains the universe that is indirectly subject to one’s Godly will, that obeys one’s value-based expectations of actualization, dedicated to actualizing the causes of justice, goodness, and truth.  The laws of nature are transformed, as soon as they are included in this circle – into laws of morality.  They become the law of the good and the righteous.  “Justice shall you pursue” becomes a law of nature.  “Halila.  It would be a desecration for the Creator of the universe to cause the death of a tsadik together with a rasha. ”  The prophets’ demand, as their natural right, that justice be clear and visible.  They refused to be satisfied with hidden justice, with justice which, while congruent with the long-term Divine Plan, appears to short-term superficially-perceiving human eyes as though “for the tsadik, all goes badly.  For the rasha, all goes well.” 

 

This circle too – though it appears unconnected and inaccessible to man – joins with the second circle to become an intimate reality directly reflecting Moral Man, who has absorbed Spiritual Man who deals with the worlds above and beyond the horizons of human existence.  When Spiritual Man is absorbed by Moral Man, then wonder of wonders, the spiritual becomes the spirit of life.  It revives existence’s dry bones, turning them into its raw materials, turning it into the robot who hurries too (though  he is mechanical and though he is perhaps compelled against his wishes) to join the animated and ecstatic circle, to dance with a Hasid’s devotion and dvaikut, to turn the parched eastern wind into a heart’s joyous song.

 

In the wake of this vast cosmic revolution, man finds himself entangled in unexpected difficulties.  The promised land that he has anticipated, by force of the Divine promise, and that he has assumed to be surely and unequivocally safe in his pocket, now becomes his heart’s desire, his soul’s yearning.  It absorbs him entirely, requiring of him self-sacrifice, devotion, endless investment of effort, and standing up to sublime moral expectations.  What once seemed like a comfortably owned property and a good deal turns into a test of one’s very existence, of one’s quality, which renews itself constantly in the face of trials and temptations that contradict his very nature.

 

Quality’s test has pushed natural survival’s test aside.  It is not as an existential right that one receives the promised land but as a tool for the expression of one’s Godly Presence, as the tool for one’s service of one’s Creator.  Upon the dweller of the land is placed a mission upon which all of creation depends: To cultivate the place of encounter which connects heaven and earth.  A place which the cultivation thereof causes union between opposites that contradict one another and threaten the wholeness and the stability of the universe.  Makom HaMikdash, the place of the Sanctuary, the place in which spirit receives its tangible actualization, and the tangible receives its spiritual quality.

 

One must not, God forbid, fail in one’s mission, and this is no reference to technical failure – to a failure in the “doing”, in the fulfillment of the ritual commandments or the service of the korbanot – but rather to failure in the human realm, in “being” whole in one’s moral perfection.  Upon the interpersonal sphere ben adam la’havero rests the interspiritual sphere, the ben adam laMakom, the connection between man and God.  The moral burden is immeasurably heavier than any objective mission.

 

It happens suddenly, without prior warning, and despite God’s promise to our forefathers, despite “see, I have given...the land that God promised to your forefathers.”  Suddenly the Divine promise is insufficient.  A personal difficulty  unexpectedly appears:  “I cannot bear you by myself.”  “How can I bear it all alone?”  “Your tiresome nuisance...your quarrels.”  “This teaches that they were nuisances, teaches that they were heretics, and teaches that they were quarrelsome.” (Rashi)

 

It was not that Israel had deteriorated.  Rather the new personal role in avodat Hashem had had the effect of highlighting every personal deficiency in stark relief, a condition which could impede their chances for success at inheriting the land, whereas at an earlier stage, the land had been freely given to them, it had lain in their pockets as paht b’salo, ‘the loaf of bread that lies already in one’s basket’, by virtue of God’s promise to their forefathers.

 

Suddenly a new need is felt – the need for morally/personally qualitative people.  “Get you wise and insightful people...”  “Also I was snubbed by God, because of you...” since the onset of the new methodology.  Even I lost the power that had been vested in me by virtue of my position.  Matters no longer depend on my direct connection with the Creator of the universe, which connection I created by my own merit.  From here on, it all depends upon you, upon a system comprised of normative, average human beings and of  each one’s own individual human quality.

 

Gone are the supermen.  No more is the sublime super-tsadik.  The land will be built upon the toil of midot, upon the devotion of all its inhabitants, upon their success at creating a model of behavioral perfection, a wondrous ideal for all the world to behold and emulate: How to build a society that is “a regal province of priests and a sacred people.”

 

How simple human beings can and must create unity  by together actualizing an ideal, by actualizing moral values and applying them at the level of conventional, normative behavior.  By resolving ancient feuds without using force as far as that is possible, while advancing peaceful suggestions.  It is only when the hand outstretched for peace is returned empty – then and only then are you permitted, and obligated to make war: “See I have given Sihon and his country into your hand.  Begin to inherit, and provoke him to war.” 

 

Why?  Because a forceful posture in this instance indicates faith in the ideal, in the Godly imperative.  It does not come from faith in one’s own power, in one’s own strong arm, but rather as an expression of faith and devotion to the Godly imperative – as a demonstration of Who the ba’al habayit, the real Landlord is.  “Today I shall begin placing  a dread of you and a fear of you over the face of the nations under the entire heavens.”

 

There is force that does not draw from the power of force itself but rather expresses the will of the Creator.  Only force that takes its imperatives from the power of mitsva, from the Creator of the universe, can be called kosher force. 

 

Milhemet  mitsva, the war of mitsva.  One who dodges this draft evades his Godly task.  He shirks the Divine imperative: “Do not fear them, for it is God Who is fighting for you.”

 Go To Top

Home

Essays

Glossary